September 28th Current Affairs
Table of Contents
UPSC Current Affairs – September 28th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 28th Current Affairs <h4> Table
UPSC Current Affairs – September 24th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 24th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 23rd
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 23rd Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 21st and 22nd
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 21st and 22nd Current Affairs
UPSC Current Affairs – September 18th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 18th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 17th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 17th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 16th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 16th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 11th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 11th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 10th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 9th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
UPSC Current Affairs – September 9th
Stay connected via Google News Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides. September 9th Current Affairs <a href=”https://primusias.com”>Home</a>
ECI’s Response on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Electoral Rolls
Why in News?
The Election Commission of India (ECI) has issued a clarification and announced measures regarding concerns surrounding the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
The clarification comes amid reports of differences within the Election Commission regarding certain decisions related to electoral rolls and SIR. The ECI has maintained that all final decisions of the Commission were taken unanimously, even though differences may arise during internal deliberations.
What is SIR?
Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an exercise undertaken by the Election Commission to verify and update electoral rolls.
Its broad objectives are to:
- Identify and remove ineligible, duplicate, deceased or shifted voters.
- Ensure that eligible citizens are included in electoral rolls.
- Improve the accuracy and integrity of voter lists.
- Allow citizens to provide documents or claims where their eligibility is questioned.
The present controversy relates particularly to voters whose names have been deleted or whose records have been flagged during the revision.
Special Intensive Revision (SIR)
SIR is an intensive exercise to verify and update electoral rolls.
It involves identifying issues such as:
- Dead voters
- Shifted voters
- Duplicate entries
- Incorrect entries
- Eligible citizens whose names may need to be added
The current nationwide SIR exercise has brought the ECI’s role in determining eligibility and maintaining electoral rolls into significant public discussion.
Why is electoral-roll revision important?
A reliable electoral roll is essential because only persons whose names are included in the electoral roll can ordinarily exercise the right to vote in an election.
However, deletion of genuine voters can have serious consequences because it may result in disenfranchisement.
What did the ECI say?
The ECI’s recent measures include:
- Home visits by Booth Level Officers
For voters whose records have been flagged because of logical or unmapped discrepancies, Booth Level Officers (BLOs) will visit their homes, collect relevant documents and upload the information to ECINet for consideration by the Electoral Registration Officers (EROs).
- No ordinary physical hearing
The ECI said such voters would ordinarily not have to appear personally for hearings after the new verification mechanism.
- Role of EROs
The issue is important because the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) is the statutory authority responsible for preparing and revising electoral rolls for an Assembly constituency.
The Representation of the People Act, 1950 provides the statutory framework for electoral-roll preparation and revision.
- Unanimous final decisions
The ECI has stated that although Election Commissioners may have differences during discussions, final decisions were taken unanimously. This response followed reports that two Election Commissioners had recorded objections on several occasions concerning SIR-related decisions.
ECINet – Why is it important?
ECINet is the Election Commission’s integrated digital platform intended to bring together several election-related applications and services.
It is significant because electoral-roll management increasingly depends on digital systems.
However, recent reporting has raised questions about whether centralised digital systems could affect the statutory powers of field-level officers such as EROs. The Indian Express reported concerns from Election Commissioners regarding the centralisation of electoral-roll functions.
Constitutional and Legal Background
Article 324
Article 324 of the Constitution provides the ECI with:
- Superintendence
- Direction
- Control
over elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of the President and Vice-President.
Therefore, the ECI is a constitutional body.
Article 325
Provides for one general electoral roll for every territorial constituency and prohibits exclusion from electoral rolls on grounds only of:
- Religion
- Race
- Caste
- Sex
Article 326
Provides for elections to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies on the basis of adult suffrage.
The voting age is 18 years.
U.S.–China: A New Equilibrium in Bilateral Relations
Why in News?
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Washington and his talks with U.S. President Donald Trump have highlighted an attempt by the two countries to establish a more stable and managed relationship despite continuing strategic rivalry.
The talks produced some limited agreements, but major disagreements over trade, semiconductors, rare earths and Taiwan remain unresolved. The Hindu describes the emerging approach as a move towards a “new equilibrium” in U.S.–China relations.
What were the major outcomes?
- Trade truce extended
The two countries agreed to extend their existing trade truce for another two months.
- A new comprehensive trade agreement was not reached.
- A $30 billion reciprocal tariff reduction arrangement was extended.
- China reaffirmed its commitment to purchase around $17 billion worth of U.S. agricultural products annually.
Thus, the talks have reduced immediate trade tensions but have not resolved the underlying trade dispute.
- Trade and Investment Board
Both sides agreed to operationalise a Board of Trade and Investment.
Its purpose is to provide a mechanism for discussing economic and trade-related issues.
Major issues remain unresolved
Several strategically important issues were deferred rather than resolved:
Semiconductors
The U.S. has imposed restrictions on China’s access to advanced semiconductor technology.
This is important because advanced chips are essential for:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Defence systems
- Supercomputing
- Advanced telecommunications
The semiconductor issue is therefore part of the broader U.S.–China technological competition.
Rare Earths
China is a major player in the global supply chains for rare-earth elements, which are important for:
- Electric vehicles
- Electronics
- Renewable-energy technologies
- Defence equipment
This creates strategic dependence for countries seeking to reduce supply-chain risks.
Taiwan
Taiwan remains one of the most sensitive issues in U.S.–China relations.
- China considers Taiwan part of its territory.
- The U.S. maintains unofficial relations with Taiwan and provides it with defensive support.
- Any escalation around Taiwan could have major consequences for Indo-Pacific security and global trade.
AI cooperation and competition
An important outcome was the creation of a new dialogue on Artificial Intelligence.
At the same time, the U.S. and China continue to compete over:
- Advanced AI
- Semiconductors
- Computing power
- Critical technologies
The two countries also agreed to establish a channel for incidents, aimed at preventing accidental escalation between the two powers.
What does “Strategic Stability” mean?
The emerging framework is described in terms of:
Fairness + Respect + Reciprocity + Strategic Stability
It does not mean that U.S.–China rivalry has ended.
Instead, both sides appear to be trying to establish a “floor” under their rivalry—that is, mechanisms that prevent competition from turning into uncontrolled confrontation.
Simple example:
They may continue competing over technology and trade, but simultaneously maintain:
Dialogue → Crisis communication → Economic negotiations → Military communication
This is an example of managed competition.
Why is U.S.–China rivalry important for India?
This development has several implications for India.
- India–U.S. strategic relationship
India has increasingly developed strategic cooperation with the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific.
If Washington seeks a more stable relationship with Beijing, India’s strategic importance to the U.S. could evolve.
However, this does not automatically mean a reduction in India–U.S. cooperation.
- China+1 opportunity
Companies seeking to reduce excessive dependence on China may diversify production to countries such as India.
This can provide India opportunities in:
- Electronics
- Semiconductors
- Batteries
- Manufacturing
- Critical minerals
The Hindu notes continued interest in India from Japanese companies under a broader China+1 strategy.
- Supply-chain diversification
The U.S.–China rivalry has encouraged countries to make supply chains more resilient.
For India, this creates an opportunity to become an alternative manufacturing and supply-chain hub.
- Indo-Pacific security
Any improvement in U.S.–China relations could influence the strategic environment of the:
- South China Sea
- Taiwan Strait
- East China Sea
- Indo-Pacific
India therefore needs to closely monitor how the relationship evolves.
India's approach: Strategic Autonomy
India needs to maintain relations with:
- U.S. → technology, defence, investment
- China → trade and regional engagement
- Russia → defence and energy
- Japan/EU/ASEAN → technology, investment and supply-chain diversification
Therefore, India’s foreign policy increasingly involves issue-based partnerships and multi-alignment, rather than permanently aligning with one major power.
The Paradox of De-Sinification in Global Production
Why in News?
The global manufacturing system is undergoing a gradual shift away from heavy dependence on China, often described as “de-Sinification” of global production.
The important point, however, is that moving a factory out of China is much easier than replacing the industrial ecosystem that supports that factory. The Hindu’s article highlights this paradox.
What is De-Sinification?
De-Sinification means reducing dependence on China and Chinese production networks for manufacturing, components, technology and supply chains.
It is driven by factors such as:
- U.S.–China geopolitical rivalry
- Trade and tariff disputes
- National-security concerns
- Supply-chain disruptions
- COVID-19 experience
- Dependence on Chinese critical minerals and components
- Desire for greater supply-chain resilience
It does not necessarily mean completely leaving China.
Instead, many companies are following a:
“China + 1” strategy
Under this approach, companies:
Continue production in China + establish additional production bases in other countries.
Countries benefiting include:
- India
- Vietnam
- Thailand
- Indonesia
- Mexico
- Malaysia
The Important Paradox
The article makes an important distinction:
Factory ≠ Industrial ecosystem
A factory is only one part of a production system.
China has developed a deep industrial ecosystem consisting of:
- Component manufacturers
- Skilled workers
- Engineering expertise
- Specialised machinery
- Logistics networks
- Raw-material suppliers
- Tooling facilities
- Research and development
- Established supplier relationships
- Large domestic market
Therefore:
Relocating a factory does not automatically relocate the ecosystem behind it.
This is the central concept you should remember for UPSC.
Example: SpaceX
SpaceX reportedly attempted to remove Chinese-made components from its supply chain.
This demonstrates that de-Sinification is no longer simply about:
“Where is the final product manufactured?”
It increasingly involves asking:
“Are Chinese components present anywhere in the supply chain?”
A company may manufacture a product in a third country while still depending on Chinese components several layers below the final manufacturer.
Why is China's Industrial Ecosystem difficult to replace?
Suppose a company shifts its factory from China to India.
It still needs:
Factory → Components → Suppliers → Skilled workers → Machinery → Logistics → Raw materials → Technical expertise
If many of these continue to come from China, the company has not completely removed its dependence on China.
Therefore, genuine de-Sinification requires the creation of alternative industrial ecosystems, not merely alternative factory locations.
Chinese companies face the opposite problem
The article highlights an interesting two-sided phenomenon.
Foreign companies:
China → Other countries
They are trying to reduce dependence on China’s industrial ecosystem.
Chinese companies:
China → Overseas
They are trying to take their production capabilities abroad.
But Chinese companies face a problem too.
For example, companies such as BYD and XPeng have expanded overseas, but they need to determine how much of their Chinese supplier ecosystem can be reproduced in foreign countries.
Example: BYD and XPeng
BYD
BYD is developing manufacturing capacity in Hungary while also developing relationships with European suppliers.
This represents an attempt to build local supply chains around overseas manufacturing.
XPeng
XPeng has contracted Magna, a Canadian automotive supplier, to assemble vehicles in Austria.
These represent different approaches to internationalisation.
What does this mean for India?
This development creates an important opportunity for India.
- China + 1 strategy
Companies looking to diversify production can establish additional manufacturing facilities in India.
- Electronics manufacturing
India can attract companies involved in:
- Electronics
- Semiconductors
- Batteries
- Automobile components
- Telecommunications equipment
- Employment
Expansion of manufacturing ecosystems can generate:
- Direct employment
- Indirect employment
- Skill development
- Technology transfer
- Export potential
India can become an important part of global value chains (GVCs).
But India faces a major challenge
Simply attracting foreign factories is not sufficient.
India needs to develop its own domestic supplier ecosystem.
This requires:
Infrastructure
Reliable:
- Roads
- Railways
- Ports
- Electricity
- Logistics
Skilled workforce
Manufacturing requires technically trained workers and engineers.
Domestic suppliers
Indian firms must be able to supply components with:
Competitive price + high quality + timely delivery.
Critical inputs
India needs secure access to:
- Critical minerals
- Electronics components
- Advanced machinery
- Energy
- Technology
The article specifically points to investments by Japanese companies such as TDK and Murata Manufacturing as examples of opportunities emerging for India.
China + 1 vs De-Sinification
China + 1 | De-Sinification |
Diversification | Reduction of dependence |
China remains part of the supply chain | Attempts to reduce/remove Chinese dependence |
Mainly driven by resilience and commercial considerations | Can also be driven by national security |
Does not require leaving China | Can involve deeper supply-chain restructuring |
Operation Drishti: Army’s Mega Eye Surgical Camp at the LoC
Why in News?
Under Operation Drishti, surgeons of the Armed Forces Medical Services (AFMS) conducted 220 sight-restoring surgeries during a two-day mega eye surgical camp at Tangdhar, Kupwara, Jammu & Kashmir, along the Line of Control (LoC).
The camp was held on September 24–25, 2026, inside an underground operation theatre because Tangdhar is a shelling-prone border area.
What is Operation Drishti?
Operation Drishti is a nationwide series of mega surgical eye camps organised by the Armed Forces Medical Services to provide advanced eye care to people in remote and underserved areas.
Main objectives
- Provide free specialised eye treatment.
- Reduce avoidable blindness.
- Take advanced medical facilities to remote and inaccessible areas.
- Help people who face financial and geographical barriers to specialised healthcare.
- Strengthen the connection between the Armed Forces and communities living in difficult border areas.
The initiative was launched in December 2024 and has covered 10 locations so far.
Recent Tangdhar Camp
Location
Tangdhar, Kupwara district, Jammu & Kashmir
It is located close to the Line of Control (LoC) and is a strategically sensitive, shelling-prone region.
Major achievement
During the 10th edition:
220 sight-restoring surgeries were performed.
Most were:
- Cataract surgeries
- Selected retinal procedures
- Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS)
The medical team transported advanced ophthalmic equipment through difficult mountainous terrain.
Why was an Underground Operation Theatre used?
Tangdhar is vulnerable to cross-border shelling because of its proximity to the LoC.
Therefore, conducting delicate eye surgeries in an underground facility provided:
Protection from external threats + sterile medical environment + continuity of healthcare
This demonstrates how military medical infrastructure can be adapted for humanitarian healthcare delivery in conflict-sensitive areas.
Who conducted the surgeries?
The surgeries were conducted by doctors from the:
Armed Forces Medical Services (AFMS)
The camp was led by the Head of Ophthalmology at Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantonment.
Advanced equipment for:
- Phacoemulsification
- Vitreoretinal procedures
- Glaucoma treatment
was transported to the mountainous border region.
KAVACH 4.0: Indigenous Automatic Train Protection System
Why in News?
KAVACH 4.0 has recently been commissioned on the Malkajgiri–Kamareddi section of the Hyderabad Division of South Central Railway, covering 108 route kilometres. It is the first commissioning of KAVACH 4.0 on South Central Railway, upgrading the earlier Version 3.2.
The development is important because KAVACH is India’s indigenously developed Automatic Train Protection (ATP) system, designed to reduce the risk of train collisions and accidents caused by excessive speed or Signal Passing at Danger (SPAD).
What is KAVACH?
KAVACH is an indigenous Automatic Train Protection (ATP) system developed by Indian Railways through the Research Designs & Standards Organisation (RDSO).
It continuously monitors:
- Train speed
- Train location
- Signal status
- Movement authority
- Distance to a potential obstruction
If the train is moving in an unsafe manner, KAVACH can automatically apply the brakes when the loco pilot does not respond appropriately.
Simple example
Suppose a train is approaching a red signal.
Normally:
Signal → Loco pilot sees it → Pilot applies brakes
With KAVACH:
Signal information → KAVACH monitors train → Warning → Automatic braking if required
Thus, technology provides an additional safety layer beyond human intervention.
What is Signal Passing at Danger (SPAD)?
SPAD means a train passes a signal showing a danger/stop indication without being authorised to proceed.
It can occur because of:
- Human error
- Misjudgement
- Excessive speed
- Poor visibility
- Fatigue
- Operational circumstances
KAVACH is designed to help prevent such incidents.
How does KAVACH work?
KAVACH uses communication between:
- Trackside equipment
Collects information regarding:
- Signals
- Track occupancy
- Points
- Route status
- RFID tags
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags installed along the track help determine the train’s location.
- On-board equipment
Equipment installed in the locomotive receives and processes information.
- UHF radio communication
Secure Ultra High Frequency (UHF) communication enables exchange of information between trackside and locomotive systems.
Overall process
Trackside information → Communication → Locomotive equipment → Continuous monitoring → Warning/automatic braking
What is special about KAVACH 4.0?
KAVACH 4.0 represents an upgraded version designed for India’s large, diverse and high-density railway network.
Important features include:
- Improved reliability
- Enhanced safety
- Better train-location monitoring
- Automatic braking
- Improved operational performance
- Greater suitability for high-density railway corridors
KAVACH is certified to Safety Integrity Level 4 (SIL-4), a high level of safety assurance used in railway signalling systems.
Recent Expansion of KAVACH
The system is being progressively deployed across Indian Railways.
According to the Ministry of Railways, KAVACH 4.0 had already been implemented across 1,306.3 route kilometres in five railway zones by early 2026, with additional sanctioned works under execution.
In September 2026, Indian Railways also approved KAVACH 4.0 for 607.7 route kilometres of Lucknow Division at a cost of ₹252 crore.
Why is KAVACH important?
- Reduces dependence on human reaction
Even when a loco pilot fails to respond to a dangerous situation, the system can intervene.
- Prevents collisions
Continuous monitoring of train movement helps reduce the possibility of unsafe train movements and collisions.
- Controls excessive speed
KAVACH can help ensure that trains remain within prescribed speed limits.
- Helps during poor visibility
Fog and other visibility problems can make conventional signal observation difficult. Automatic protection provides an additional safety mechanism.
- Indigenous technology
KAVACH reduces dependence on imported train-protection technologies and demonstrates India’s capability in railway signalling and safety technology.
Related
Discover more from Primus Civil Services Academy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


