December 04th Current Affairs
Table of Contents
Dramaturgy
Home / Dramaturgy Dramaturgy is a sociological perspective developed by Erving Goffman, which views social life as a theatrical performance.
Symbolic Interactionism
Home / Symbolic Interactionism Symbolic Interactionism is a major sociological perspective associated primarily with George Herbert Mead and Charles Horton
UPSC Current Affairs – December 10
December 10th Current Affairs Home / Table of Contents INDIA bloc MPs move motion to impeach HC judge Relevance to
Ethnomethodology
Home / Ethnomethodology Ethnomethodology, introduced by Harold Garfinkel, examines how people use everyday, common-sense knowledge to interpret situations, organise interactions,
Phenomenology in Sociology
Home / Phenomenology in Sociology Phenomenology argues that the subject matter of social sciences fundamentally differs from that of natural
UPSC Current Affairs – December 8
December 08th Current Affairs Home / Table of Contents Parliament approves Bill to levy higher excise duty on tobacco Relevance
Interpretive Sociology
Home / Interpretive Sociology Interpretive sociology examines how individuals construct and attach meaning to their social realities. It stresses that
UPSC Current Affairs – December 4
December 04th Current Affairs Home / Table of Contents Law Commission to brief joint committee of Parliament on simultaneous polls
Non-Positivist Methodologies in Social Research
Home / Non-Positivist Methodologies in Social Research Shift from Positivism to Non-Positivism As sociologists recognized that social realities cannot be
UPSC Current Affairs – December 3
December 03rd Current Affairs Home / Table of Contents Govt ready to talk about electoral reforms in Parliament, but not
Law Commission to brief joint committee of Parliament on simultaneous polls on December 4
Relevance to UPSC
GS Paper-II: Polity & Governance
- Concerns electoral reforms, an essential syllabus theme—especially the idea of “One Nation, One Election” (ONOE) or simultaneous polls.
- Helps understand constitutional amendments, federal implications, administrative restructuring, and the role of institutions (Election Commission, Law Commission, Parliament).
- Important for debates on cooperative federalism, Centre–State relations, democratic functioning, and reduction of election-related disruptions.
GS Paper-II: Parliament & Legislative Process
- Examines the role of Parliamentary committees, especially joint committees—how they scrutinise major proposals before legislative action.
- Relevant for understanding how expert bodies like the Law Commission feed into law-making.
More About the News
- On December 4, 2025, the Law Commission of India is scheduled to present its detailed briefing to the Joint Committee of Parliament examining the feasibility of simultaneous elections—Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, and possibly local bodies.
- This briefing follows months of consultations with constitutional experts, former Chief Election Commissioners, political parties, and administrative bodies.
- The Law Commission has reportedly assessed:
- Required constitutional amendments
- Possible models for synchronising elections
- Mechanisms for handling hung assemblies, mid-term collapses, or no-confidence scenarios
- Fiscal and administrative benefits of reducing election frequency
- The Joint Committee—constituted in 2024—was tasked with reviewing the government’s proposal for phased or full-scale simultaneous polls.
- This step signals that the government is moving closer to a structured framework for ONOE, though full adoption may require wide political consensus and agreement with states.
- The briefing is likely to shape the draft report of the committee, which may further feed into future legislative proposals on electoral reform.
Simultaneous Polls
Simultaneous Elections (or “One Nation, One Election”) refer to holding elections to the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and all State Legislative Assemblies at the same time — i.e., voters cast their ballots for both on the same day or in a close timeframe.
Historical Background
- 1951–52, 1957, 1962, and 1967: Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections were held simultaneously.
- Post-1967: The cycle broke due to:
- Early dissolutions of some assemblies.
- Political instability and premature dissolutions of Lok Sabha (e.g., 1970, 1999).
- Since then, elections to various state assemblies and the Lok Sabha have been held separately.
Constitutional and Legal Framework
Relevant Articles:
- Article 83(2) – Term of Lok Sabha: 5 years (unless dissolved earlier).
- Article 172(1) – Term of State Legislative Assemblies: 5 years (unless dissolved earlier).
- Article 356 – President’s Rule can dissolve state assemblies.
- Article 85 & 174 – Empower President/Governor to dissolve legislatures.
Currently, these provisions do not mandate synchronization of elections — hence, legal and constitutional amendments are required to achieve it.
Rationale Behind Simultaneous Elections
A. Governance Efficiency
- Frequent elections disrupt normal administrative work as the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) halts policy decisions.
- Simultaneous elections would allow continuous governance and policy implementation.
B. Cost Savings
- Conducting elections simultaneously reduces expenditure on logistics, security, and manpower.
- Example: The 2019 Lok Sabha elections cost the Election Commission nearly ₹60,000 crore (including political party expenditure).
C. Reduced Political Polarization
- Continuous elections promote vote bank politics and short-term populism.
- One-time elections can lead to long-term policy focus.
D. Ease for Election Commission
- Simplifies logistics, deployment of security forces, and training of personnel.
E. Voter Convenience
- Reduces voter fatigue by allowing them to vote once in a fixed period.
Arguments Against Simultaneous Elections
A. Federalism Concerns
- May undermine the autonomy of states, as the central government’s tenure might indirectly affect state governance.
- Synchronizing all states could lead to a centralized political narrative, weakening regional voices.
B. Logistical Challenges
- India has over 90 crore voters and more than 10 lakh polling stations — organizing a simultaneous poll is a massive administrative task.
C. Constitutional Amendments Required
- At least five constitutional amendments (Articles 83, 85, 172, 174, 356) will be necessary.
- Requires ratification by half of the states under Article 368(2).
D. Political Impracticality
- In case of a hung assembly, no-confidence motion, or premature dissolution, synchronization will again break.
- Enforcing President’s Rule just to maintain the cycle may be unconstitutional and undemocratic.
E. Impact on Voter Behavior
Voters may vote the same way for both state and national elections — leading to a “nationalization” of politics and diminishing local issues.
Committees and Reports on the Issue
Committee / Report | Year | Key Recommendations |
Law Commission of India (170th Report) | 1999 | Suggested simultaneous elections to avoid frequent elections and policy paralysis. |
Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice | 2015 | Proposed holding elections in two phases: half the states with Lok Sabha, remaining mid-term. |
NITI Aayog Discussion Paper (Bibek Debroy & Kishore Desai) | 2017 | Suggested constitutional amendments and a transition plan. |
Law Commission Draft Report | 2018 | Supported the idea but emphasized broad political consensus and constitutional safeguards. |
High-Level Committee on One Nation, One Election (headed by Ram Nath Kovind) | 2024 | Recommended practical steps to synchronize elections, including phased alignment and possible constitutional amendments. |
Implementation Challenges
- Need for constitutional amendments.
- Risk of political instability breaking the cycle.
- Consensus among political parties is crucial.
- Ensuring uniform voter turnout and security arrangements across the country.
Way Forward
- Broad Political Consensus
- All-party agreement is essential before implementing such a fundamental change.
- Constitutional Safeguards
- Clear provisions for handling premature dissolutions and mid-term polls.
- Incremental Approach
- Start with synchronizing elections in some states and Lok Sabha, then expand gradually.
- Administrative Preparation
- Strengthen Election Commission, security forces, and voting infrastructure.
- Public Awareness and Consultation
- Engage civil society, voters, and constitutional experts to ensure legitimacy
Simultaneous elections can improve governance efficiency and reduce costs, but they also pose serious constitutional, logistical, and federal challenges. For a diverse democracy like India, the path forward must be gradual, consultative, and constitutionally sound — ensuring that in the pursuit of efficiency, the federal spirit and democratic diversity are not compromised.
In short: “One Nation, One Election” should aim for One Purpose — Strengthening Democracy, not just convenience.
Prelims MCQ
Q. Consider the following statements regarding the proposal for Simultaneous Elections (“One Nation, One Election”) in India:
1. Implementing simultaneous polls requires constitutional amendments under Article 368.
2. The Election Commission of India must mandatorily issue a single electoral roll for both Parliamentary and State Assembly elections for simultaneous polls to be conducted.
3. The Law Commission of India has recommended fixed terms for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies to operationalise simultaneous elections.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 1 and 3 only
C. 2 and 3 only
D. 1, 2 and 3
Correct Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only
Explanation:
• Statement 1 – Correct: Simultaneous elections require amendments to Articles **83, 85, 172, 174**, and possibly **356**, all requiring Article 368 procedure.
• Statement 2 – Incorrect: ECI already uses a **single, unified electoral roll** for Parliamentary & Assembly elections. No new roll is required for simultaneous polls.
• Statement 3 – Correct: The **170th Law Commission (1999)** and the **279th Law Commission (2023–24)** recommended fixed terms with provisions for hung houses to enable simultaneous elections.
Therefore, statements **1 and 3** are correct.
Mains Question
Q. Discuss the feasibility and challenges of implementing simultaneous elections in India. How would such a reform impact federalism, administrative efficiency, and democratic accountability?
Labour codes likely to be fully operational from April 1, 2026, Govt to pre-publish draft rules soon
Relevance to UPSC
GS Paper-II: Governance / Social Justice
- Covers major policy reforms, especially labour regulation, social protection, and welfare of workers in the formal and informal sectors.
- Relevant for understanding Centre–State coordination, rule-making processes, and federal challenges in labour matters (Concurrent List).
GS Paper-III: Economy / Employment
- Labour reforms directly affect Ease of Doing Business, job creation, industrial relations, and compliance burdens on enterprises.
- Helps analyse structural reforms in India’s labour market, informalisation issues, gig economy dynamics, and productivity concerns.
- Important for topics like industrial growth, social security codes, and reforms to promote investment.
GS Paper-II / GS Paper-III: Policy Implementation
- Shows how major reforms require subordinate legislation, stakeholder consultations, and harmonisation across states—important for understanding the policy cycle and administrative challenges.
More About the News
- The Central Government is preparing to fully operationalise all four Labour Codes —
- Code on Wages, 2019
- Code on Social Security, 2020
- Industrial Relations Code, 2020
- Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (OSH) Code, 2020
— by April 1, 2026.
- Before the rollout, the government will pre-publish draft rules for final stakeholder consultation, ensuring transparency and facilitating state-level rule alignment.
- Implementation has been delayed as several states had not finalised their rules; labour being a Concurrent List subject requires coordinated rule-making for uniform enforcement.
- Full implementation is expected to rationalise 29 central labour laws into four comprehensive codes, simplifying compliance and improving regulatory clarity for industries.
- The Social Security Code’s provisions on gig workers, platform workers, and unorganised workers are expected to significantly strengthen social protection frameworks.
- The likely 2026 rollout positions labour reform as a major milestone in India’s larger economic reform agenda, aimed at boosting investment climate, formalisation, and worker welfare.
- The Central Government is preparing to fully operationalise all four Labour Codes —
Businesses are preparing for changes in wage definitions, hiring flexibility, working conditions, and compliance systems once the codes come into force.
Labour Code
Note: The above topic has been covered under the Current Affairs of 25/11/2025. Click here and refer to it
Gyanesh Kumar takes charge as head of International IDEA council
Relevance to UPSC
GS Paper-II: International Relations / Global Governance
- Involves understanding the role of international democracy institutions, multilateral bodies, and India’s global engagements.
- Highlights India’s rising leadership in global governance structures and its contribution to strengthening democratic norms worldwide.
GS Paper-II: Polity & Democracy
- International IDEA’s work on electoral processes, constitutional design, and democratic resilience ties directly to UPSC themes like electoral reforms, democratic institutions, and comparative political systems.
- Important for analysing India’s democratic soft power and diplomatic outreach through value-based institutions.
GS Paper-II / GS Paper-III: Governance
- Shows how democratic assistance, capacity-building, and institutional strengthening are key elements of India’s governance diplomacy.
- Relevant for questions on global democratic backsliding, reforms in electoral management, and technology-enabled democracy.
More About the News
- Gyanesh Kumar, Chief Election Commissioner of India, has formally taken charge as the Chair of the Council of International IDEA (Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance).
- International IDEA is an intergovernmental organisation headquartered in Stockholm, working globally to support electoral integrity, democratic consolidation, constitutional reforms, and political participation.
- Kumar’s appointment reflects India’s emerging leadership role in international democracy support mechanisms.
- As Chair of the Council, he will guide strategic decisions on the organisation’s activities across regions experiencing democratic strain, conflict transitions, and electoral challenges.
- His experience in public administration and electoral processes is expected to strengthen IDEA’s engagement with South Asia, the Indo-Pacific, and other developing democracies.
- India has been a long-standing member of International IDEA; this appointment is seen as a boost to India’s democratic diplomacy, enhancing cooperation on electoral best practices and governance innovation.
- The development aligns with India’s broader strategy of contributing to rules-based global governance and strengthening institutions that promote democratic resilience.
International IDEA Council
The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) is an intergovernmental organisation established in 1995, headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. It works globally to strengthen democracy, electoral integrity, political representation, and constitutional processes.
The Council is its top governing body comprising all member states, responsible for strategic decisions, oversight, and institutional direction.
India is a member of International IDEA and in 2025, Gyanesh Kumar, Chief Election Commissioner of India, assumed charge as Chair of the International IDEA Council, marking a significant milestone in India’s democratic diplomacy.
Mandate and Objectives of International IDEA
International IDEA aims to:
- Support credible and inclusive elections
- Strengthen political parties and representation
- Promote constitutional design in transitioning democracies
- Enhance democratic resilience and tackle disinformation
- Support women’s political participation
- Facilitate research and global knowledge sharing (e.g., Global State of Democracy Report)
Its mandate covers policy advice, capacity-building, technical support, and data-based democratic assessments.
Role and Functions of the International IDEA Council
- Sets the strategic direction for global democracy-related work
- Reviews programmes on elections, constitution-building, political participation
- Approves annual work plans, budget, and long-term democratic assessments
- Ensures member-state coordination on themes like
- electoral integrity
- governance reforms
- democratic transitions
- Facilitates global partnerships with UN bodies, regional organisations, EC, AU, OAS, etc.
Why is the Council Important?
- Ensures global standards on
- electoral management
- campaign finance regulation
- constitutional transitions
- political party strengthening
- Acts as a bridge between developed and developing democracies
- Provides guidance during conflict transitions (e.g., Sudan, Nepal, Myanmar)
- Tracks global decline in democracy and rising authoritarian tendencies
- Produces authoritative datasets used by academics and governments
- Ensures global standards on
India’s Engagement with International IDEA
(a) India as a Member State
India is a founding member and actively contributes to:
Electoral process strengthening
South–South cooperation
Capacity-building programs in Asia and Africa
(b) India’s Appointment to Chair the Council (2025)
Gyanesh Kumar’s appointment shows:
India’s increasing role in democratic multilateralism
Recognition of India’s electoral management expertise
Alignment with India’s global image as the “largest democracy”
(c) Key areas where India adds value
Digital electoral processes (eVMs, remote voting research)
Voter inclusion initiatives
Federal electoral management
Electoral integrity and transparency practices
(d) Benefits for India
Enhances strategic soft power
Positions India as a thought leader in democracy promotion
Strengthens India’s voice in global governance conversations
Opens avenues for electoral capacity-building partnerships
Challenges and Criticisms
- Global democratic backsliding reduces the influence of such institutions
- Limited enforcement power—depends on cooperation of member states
- Funding constraints
- Rising geopolitical rivalries complicate consensus-building
- Democracies face internal credibility challenges (polarisation, digital misinformation)
Significance for Global Governance
International IDEA Council functions as a crucial platform for:
- Norm-setting in democracies
- Facilitating political transitions
- Providing expertise in constitution-making
- Strengthening electoral institutions in fragile states
- Guiding peaceful power transitions
It complements UN bodies but focuses exclusively on democracy support, making it unique globally.
International IDEA and its Council play a pivotal role in strengthening global democratic norms through research, capacity-building, and cooperation. India’s leadership in the Council enhances its democratic soft power and reinforces its commitment to supporting transparent, resilient, and inclusive governance worldwide.
Prelims MCQ
Q. With reference to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), consider the following statements:
1. It is an intergovernmental organisation that works globally to strengthen electoral processes, political participation, and constitutional design.
2. Its Council is the highest decision-making body composed of all member states.
3. The headquarters of International IDEA is located in Geneva, Switzerland.
4. India is a founding member and currently holds the chairmanship of the Council.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A. 1, 2 and 4 only
B. 1 and 3 only
C. 2 and 4 only
D. 1, 2, 3 and 4
Correct Answer: (a) 1, 2 and 4 only
Explanation:
• Statement 1 – Correct: International IDEA is an intergovernmental organisation promoting democracy worldwide through support for elections, political participation, and constitutional reform.
• Statement 2 – Correct: The Council of Member States is the apex governing and decision-making body of International IDEA.
• Statement 3 – Incorrect: Its headquarters is in Stockholm, Sweden, not Geneva.
• Statement 4 – Correct: India is a founding member, and in 2025, **Gyanesh Kumar** assumed chairmanship of the International IDEA Council.
Hence, statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
Mains Question
Q. Discuss the role of International IDEA in strengthening global democratic governance. How does India’s leadership in the International IDEA Council enhance its democratic diplomacy and soft power?
Centre evasive on delay in appointments to National Commission for Minorities
Relevance to UPSC
GS Paper-II: Polity & Governance
- Concerns the functioning of statutory bodies, their autonomy, and government accountability—core syllabus areas.
- Helps understand mechanisms of minority welfare, institutional design, and challenges in governance related to appointments and vacancies.
GS Paper-II: Constitutional Provisions & Rights
- Directly linked to Article 29 and Article 30, minority rights, and the Centre’s responsibility in ensuring representation and institutional safeguards.
- Relevant for questions on the effectiveness of commissions established under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992.
GS Paper-II: Administrative Reforms
- Vacancies in critical institutions show issues of oversight, governance delays, and coordination failures—important themes for administrative reform and accountability debates.
- Vacancies in critical institutions show issues of oversight, governance delays, and coordination failures—important themes for administrative reform and accountability debates.
More about the News
- The Union Government has been unable to clearly explain the prolonged delay in filling vacancies in the National Commission for Minorities (NCM), despite multiple queries raised in Parliament and by civil society.
- Currently, key positions — including members and in some periods even the chairperson — have remained vacant, weakening the Commission’s ability to address grievances and monitor the welfare of notified minority communities.
- The NCM, a statutory body under the NCM Act, 1992, is mandated to evaluate safeguards for minorities, investigate complaints, and advise the government. Prolonged vacancies therefore undermine its effectiveness.
- Opposition MPs have criticised the Centre’s non-committal responses regarding timelines, citing concerns over institutional neglect and reduced oversight on issues affecting religious and linguistic minorities.
- The delay has also raised questions about procedural transparency, selection processes, and whether the government plans structural reforms for the Commission.
- Administrative gaps in the NCM coincide with rising debates on minority rights, inclusion, and the government’s approach to diversity management—making the matter more politically and socially significant.
- The government has maintained that the appointment process is “under consideration” without providing definitive timelines.
National Commission for Minorities (NCM)
Genesis and Legal Basis
- The precursor to NCM was the “Minorities Commission,” created in 1978 via a Ministry resolution.
- Through the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, Parliament provided it statutory status. The Act came into force on 17 May 1993.
- Therefore, NCM is a statutory body (unlike some other commissions with constitutional status).
Definition of “Minority” & Communities Covered
- According to the Act, “minority” means a community notified as such by the Central Government.
- Over time, the Union Government has officially recognised six religious minority communities under NCM’s mandate:
- Initially: Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Zoroastrians (Parsis)
- In 2014, Jains were added as a notified minority.
- NCM’s functions relate to the welfare and rights of these notified communities.
Composition, Tenure & Institutional Setup
- The Commission comprises: a Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson, and five Members — all nominated by the Central Government from among persons of eminence, integrity, and ability.
- Importantly, the Chairperson and all Members must belong to one of the notified minority communities.
- The term of office is 3 years from assumption of office.
- NCM functions under the administrative control of the Ministry of Minority Affairs, Government of India.
Powers, Functions and Mandate
As per Section 9 of the NCM Act, NCM’s main functions include:
- Evaluating the progress of development of minority communities across Union and States.
- Monitoring the working of constitutional and legal safeguards for minorities under central and state laws.
- Making recommendations for effective implementation of safeguards by Centre/States.
- Examining complaints of deprivation of rights or safeguards of minorities, and taking up with concerned authorities.
- Conducting studies, research, and analysis on socio-economic and educational development of minorities and on discrimination issues.
- Suggesting measures for welfare and protection of minorities to government(s).
- Making periodical or special reports to the Central Government about issues faced by minorities.
While performing certain functions (like inquiries, complaints), NCM has quasi-judicial powers, akin to a civil court: e.g. summoning persons, examining on oath, requiring documents, requisitioning public records, issuing commissions to examine witnesses/documents.
Significance of NCM in India’s Institutional Framework
- NCM serves as a statutory watchdog and advisory body for minority welfare, safeguarding rights under constitutional guarantees (e.g. Articles 15, 25-30, 350-B) and in statutory laws.
- Acts as a forum for grievances, protection and redressal — particularly in cases of discrimination, deprivation, or denial of minority rights.
- Through its research and reports, NCM helps assess implementation of minority welfare policies and suggest corrective measures.
- It plays a role in policy formulation and legislative recommendations, serving as a bridge between minority communities, the government, and society.
Hence, NCM is a key institution for ensuring social justice, equality, and pluralism — core values under Indian Constitution.
Key Challenges & Criticisms
Despite its mandate, NCM faces several structural and functional limitations:
- Lack of Constitutional Status: As a statutory body (not constitutional), NCM lacks the autonomy, independence, and clout that bodies like commissions for SCs/STs enjoy.
- Limited Enforcement Power: Although it has quasi-judicial powers, NCM’s decisions/recommendations are not binding — their implementation depends on the goodwill of Centre or State governments.
- Institutional Vacancies / Non-functionality: There have been instances where the Commission remained non-functional or without full membership; e.g. as of 2025, all posts reportedly remain vacant.
- Ambiguous Definition of Minority: The Act leaves definition of “minority” to the Central Government’s notification — leading to lack of clarity on criteria, potentially excluding some communities or ignoring regional diversity (religious, linguistic, cultural).
- Limited Institutional Capacity & Follow-up: Reports and recommendations often lack follow-up. NCM’s advisory nature and limited resources reduce its ability to effect visible change on the ground.
- Overlap / Dilution of Mandate: For education-related minority issues, a separate body — National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (NCMEI) — was established, limiting NCM’s scope.
These indicate structural design flaws, limited independence, and challenge the efficacy of the NCM.
Recent Concerns & Contemporary Relevance
- As per recent reports (2025), NCM has been non-functional due to vacancies in all key posts. This has prompted a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Delhi High Court demanding reconstitution.
- The vacancy issue and functional inertia has revived the debate over granting constitutional status to NCM to make it more effective and independent.
- Given rising concerns over minority rights, communal tensions, social discrimination, and issues around inclusive development, the role of NCM (or a reformed version) remains vital for safeguarding constitutional guarantees and ensuring social justice.
Way Forward — Strengthening NCM
To make NCM more effective and relevant, following reforms are often recommended:
- Constitutional Status — upgrading from statutory to constitutional commission (like those for SC/ST), to ensure autonomy, stability, and authority.
- Clear Criteria for Minority Status — more transparent, objective criteria (religious, linguistic, social) rather than ad hoc notifications.
- Binding Powers or Stronger Follow-up Mechanism — ensure that recommendations/orders have enforceability or mandatory government response.
- Full-time Functional Commission — timely appointments to ensure minimum vacancies, regular hearings, redressal and outreach.
- Adequate Resources & Capacity Building — staff, research units, regional presence to monitor minority issues across India.
- Better Coordination with Related Bodies — synergy with NCMEI, human rights institutions, state minority commissions to avoid overlap and improve coverage.
These reforms can help align NCM with India’s constitutional vision of equality, justice, and pluralism.
The National Commission for Minorities, established through the 1992 Act, plays a vital role in safeguarding minority rights, ensuring constitutional safeguards, and promoting social justice through advisory, investigatory and recommendatory functions. However, structural limitations — statutory status, limited enforcement power, institutional vacancies, and weak follow-up — significantly undermine its effectiveness. For NCM to fulfil its constitutional promise of protecting minority interests in a diverse India, a structural overhaul — including granting constitutional status, enhancing autonomy and capacity — is essential.
Prelims MCQ
Q. With reference to the National Commission for Minorities (NCM), consider the following statements:
1. The National Commission for Minorities is a constitutional body established under Article 338 of the Constitution.
2. The Central Government notifies minority communities under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992.
3. The NCM has the powers of a civil court while investigating complaints regarding deprivation of rights of minorities.
4. Only religious minorities notified by the Centre can be considered for NCM membership.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A. 2 and 3 only
B. 1, 2 and 4 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 2, 3 and 4 only
Correct Answer: (a) 2 and 3 only
Explanation:
• Statement 1 – Incorrect: NCM is a statutory body created by the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992—not a constitutional body.
• Statement 2 – Correct: Under Section 2(c) of the NCM Act, 1992, the **Central Government** notifies minority communities (currently: Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Parsis, Jains).
• Statement 3 – Correct: NCM has **civil court powers** such as summoning witnesses, demanding documents, receiving affidavits, etc., while conducting inquiries.
• Statement 4 – Incorrect: The Act does not mandate that only persons from notified minorities must be appointed. Members are usually chosen from minority communities by convention, not by law.
Hence, statements 2 and 3 are correct.
Mains Question
Q. Discuss the role and effectiveness of the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) in protecting the rights of minorities in India. Highlight the major challenges it faces and suggest reforms to strengthen its mandate.
Rupee hits ₹90/dollar as economy awaits U.S.-trade deal
Relevance to UPSC
GS Paper-III: Economy — External Sector
- Important for understanding exchange rate dynamics, currency depreciation, foreign exchange market volatility, and macroeconomic stability.
- Links directly to topics like Balance of Payments, forex reserves, capital flows, FDI/FPI, and global economic linkages.
GS Paper-II / GS Paper-III: International Trade & Diplomacy
- The U.S.–India trade deals influence tariff regimes, market access, technology transfer, and investment flows.
- Relevant for analysing how trade negotiations impact domestic economic indicators, investor confidence, and bilateral relations.
GS Paper-III: Economic Challenges & Policy Response
- Helps examine how external shocks, global uncertainty, and geopolitical negotiations influence India’s monetary policy, export competitiveness, inflationary pressures, and overall economic resilience.
- Helps examine how external shocks, global uncertainty, and geopolitical negotiations influence India’s monetary policy, export competitiveness, inflationary pressures, and overall economic resilience.
More About the News
- The Indian rupee slid to ₹90 per U.S. dollar, marking a historic low, amid heightened uncertainty as the country awaits the finalisation of a U.S.–India trade deal.
- Currency markets reacted to delays in negotiations, concerns over tariff disagreements, and global risk aversion triggered by slowing global demand and volatile commodity prices.
- The weakening rupee has sparked concerns over imported inflation, particularly in crude oil, electronics, and capital goods.
- The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has reportedly intervened intermittently in the foreign exchange market to prevent excessive volatility, while emphasising that the rupee’s movement remains “orderly”.
- Investors are watching the trade deal closely as it could unlock improved market access, technology cooperation, and reduced tariff barriers — factors that may stabilise sentiment and strengthen the currency.
- Exporters see short-term gains from a weaker rupee, but industry bodies have cautioned against long-term instability impacting supply chains and project costs.
- Economists note that the rupee’s depreciation also reflects broader global trends, including a strong U.S. dollar supported by high interest rates and safe-haven inflows.
India-USA Trade Relations
Note: The above topic has been covered under the Current Affairs of 25/11/2025. Click here and refer to it


