Primus Civil Services Academy

July 23rd Current Affairs

Home / UPSC / Current affairs / BRICS and its emerging global role
Operation Sindoor - Primus IAS
Current affairs

Operation Sindoor

July 21st Current Affairs Home / Operation Sindoor Why in News? Parliament’s Monsoon Session, starting July 21, 2025, is expected to feature

Read More »
Sesismic Waves - Primus IAS
Current affairs

Alaska Earthquakes

July 21st Current Affairs Home / Alaska Earthquakes Why in News? On July 21, 2025, Alaska Peninsula was struck by

Read More »

BRICS and its emerging global role

BRICS and its emerging global role

Context

The 2025 BRICS summit in Brazil signaled a steady but strategic shift in global geopolitics. Though devoid of dramatic headlines, the summit reinforced BRICS’s quiet but persistent challenge to the Western-led liberal international order, especially regarding global finance, trade rules, and developmental institutions. From de-dollarisation to institution-building, BRICS is asserting the need for a multipolar world where Global South countries have a larger say.

History

  • Formed in 2009 (originally as BRIC), with South Africa joining in 2010.
  • Conceived as a platform for emerging economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) to push back against a post-World War II order built by the West.
  • Over time, it evolved from a symbolic group into a functional geopolitical and economic bloc.
  • The New Development Bank (NDB) and Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) were key milestones in institutional development.

Reasons for Formation of BRICS

  • Global Inequality: Uneven representation in institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and UNSC.
  • Dollar Dependence: Vulnerability to US-led sanctions and financial exclusion (e.g., SWIFT restrictions).
  • Alternative Vision: Desire to promote development models not anchored in Western liberal norms.
  • Global South Leadership: Offer a collective voice for the underrepresented majority of the world.

Aims of BRICS

  • Promote economic cooperation among emerging economies.
  • Reform global governance institutions to reflect 21st-century realities.
  • Enhance South-South cooperation in development, technology, and sustainability.
  • Advance de-dollarisation through local currency trade and a potential BRICS currency.
  • Offer non-conditional loans via NDB, unlike IMF or World Bank.

Why the West Is Taking BRICS Seriously

  • Growing economic clout: BRICS now represents over 40% of global population and about 25% of global GDP.
  • Moves toward de-dollarisation threaten US financial dominance.
  • BRICS platforms like NDB offer alternatives to Western-dominated institutions.
  • The group is increasingly institutionalised, signaling long-term ambitions.
  • Post-Ukraine war, BRICS has become an attractive platform for countries wary of Western sanctions.

Role of Stakeholders

  • China: Financial powerhouse, promotes alternatives to Western norms.
  • Russia: Seeks to break Western isolation post-Ukraine.
  • India: Bridge between the West and Global South, promoting multipolarity without confrontation.
  • Brazil & South Africa: Represent democratic Global South voices, push for inclusivity and equity.

Definition of Technical Terms

  • De-dollarisation: Reducing dependency on the US dollar in global trade and finance.
  • SWIFT: Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication — a global messaging network for financial transactions.
  • Multipolarity: A world order where multiple powers share global influence, not dominated by one or two blocs.

Impacts

On the World

  • Shifting toward multipolarity, reducing US-led dominance.
  • Greater development choices for low-income countries.
  • Rise of new financial ecosystems (local currency trade, NDB loans).

On India

  • Leverages BRICS for strategic autonomy.
  • Balances relations with China and Russia while maintaining ties with the West.
  • Promotes leadership in Global South, advocating for UNSC reforms and fairer global trade norms.

Challenges Faced by BRICS

  • Internal Disparities: India-China tensions; Russia’s diplomatic isolation.
  • Ideological Diversity: Democratic vs. authoritarian models within BRICS.
  • Limited Institutional Capacity: NDB still small vs. Bretton Woods institutions.
  • Lack of Consensus on expansion, currency, and geopolitical strategy.

Way Forward

  • Institutional Strengthening: Empower NDB, create BRICS rating agency.
  • Financial Innovation: Pilot local currency trade platforms.
  • Bridge Building: Use India, Brazil, and South Africa to attract neutral or non-aligned states.
  • Geopolitical Dialogue: Manage internal conflicts like China-India tension through BRICS diplomacy.
  • Engage Global South: Expand membership and support developmental needs.

Prelims MCQ

Q. Consider the following statements regarding BRICS:

  1. The New Development Bank (NDB) provides loans in local currencies to reduce dollar dependence.
  2. BRICS proposes to create its own credit rating agency to counter Western dominance.
  3. All BRICS countries follow the same political system and development model.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?
A. 1 and 2 only
B. 1 and 3 only
C. 2 and 3 only
D. 1, 2, and 3

Answer: A. 1 and 2 only

Explanation:

  • Statement 1 is correct: NDB has started issuing loans in local currencies like yuan, rupee, and rand to reduce reliance on the dollar.
  • Statement 2 is correct: BRICS has discussed setting up a credit rating agency as an alternative to Moody’s, S&P, etc.
  • Statement 3 is incorrect: BRICS includes a mix of democracies (India, Brazil, South Africa) and authoritarian states (China, Russia).

Mains Question

Q. Examine how BRICS is challenging the existing Western-dominated liberal international order. What role can India play in reshaping the global governance system through its engagement in BRICS? (250 words)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top