Primus Civil Services Academy

Login / Register
Facebook Instagram Youtube Telegram X-twitter
  • +91 9364908441
  • reachout@primusias.com
Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for the latest travel updates and guides.
Add as preferred source on Google

September 11th Current Affairs

Home / UPSC / Current affairs / UPSC Current Affairs – September 11th

Table of Contents

A Unilateral America in a Post-Unipolar World

What is the news?

An opinion article examines how 25 years after the 9/11 attacks, the United States’ “War on Terror” has transformed not only global security but also America’s position in the international system. The article argues that the post-9/11 period contributed to a more unilateral approach by the U.S., while the world has gradually moved away from clear American unipolarity.

What is Unipolarity?

Unipolarity is an international system in which one country possesses overwhelming economic, military and political power compared with other states.

After the Cold War ended in 1991 and the Soviet Union collapsed, the U.S. emerged as the world’s dominant superpower.

This period is often described as the “unipolar moment”, with the U.S. enjoying unmatched military and strategic capabilities.

How did 9/11 change U.S. foreign policy?

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks became a major turning point.

The U.S. launched the Global War on Terror, initially targeting Al-Qaeda and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

This was followed by:

  • 2001 – Afghanistan: U.S.-led intervention against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
  • 2003 – Iraq: U.S.-led invasion and overthrow of Saddam Hussein.
  • Expansion of counter-terrorism operations, drone warfare and intelligence cooperation in several regions.

The U.S. increasingly viewed terrorism as a global security threat, rather than merely a domestic or regional problem. The post-9/11 strategy also strengthened the idea that Washington could act pre-emptively against perceived threats.

What does “unilateral America” mean?

Unilateralism means that a country is willing to take major foreign-policy or military decisions without requiring broad international consensus.

The post-9/11 period strengthened this tendency in U.S. foreign policy.

The Bush Doctrine emphasised:

  • Pre-emptive action against perceived threats
  • Counter-terrorism
  • Military superiority
  • Regime change in certain circumstances
  • Willingness to act without complete international agreement

This was particularly visible in the 2003 Iraq War, which faced significant opposition internationally.

How did the War on Terror affect America's strategic position?

The War on Terror initially demonstrated America’s enormous military power. However, prolonged wars also created strategic and political costs.

Major consequences:

Afghanistan

  • The U.S. spent two decades in Afghanistan.
  • The Taliban eventually returned to power in 2021.
  • This demonstrated the limits of military power in achieving long-term political outcomes.

Iraq

  • The invasion removed Saddam Hussein.
  • However, the conflict contributed to prolonged instability.
  • The subsequent instability created space for extremist organisations, including ISIS.

Global perception

  • U.S. military interventions generated criticism regarding civilian casualties, sovereignty and international law.
  • This affected America’s global image and its ability to build consensus.

Thus, military superiority did not automatically translate into sustainable political influence.

From a Unipolar World to a More Competitive World

The article’s larger argument is that the international system has changed significantly since 2001.

The U.S. remains a major global power, but it no longer operates in a world where its dominance is completely uncontested.

The rise of:

  • China
  • Russia
  • India
  • Regional powers
  • New groupings such as BRICS

has contributed to a more multipolar international system.

Therefore, the world has gradually moved from:

Post-Cold War Unipolarity → U.S.-dominated War on Terror → Increasing Strategic Competition → Emerging Multipolarity

Why is this important for India?

For India, the changing international order creates both opportunities and challenges.

Strategic autonomy

India can avoid excessive dependence on any single major power and maintain relations with multiple centres of power.

India-U.S. relations

The U.S. remains an important partner for India in:

  • Defence
  • Technology
  • Trade
  • Indo-Pacific security
  • Counter-terrorism

China factor

The rise of China makes the Indo-Pacific increasingly important for India’s foreign policy.

Multipolarity

A multipolar world provides India greater diplomatic space to engage simultaneously with:

U.S. + Russia + Europe + China + Global South

Rude Lessons: On the U.S.–Canada Trade Dispute, Lessons for India

The editorial argues that the ongoing U.S.–Canada trade dispute offers important lessons for India, particularly about the risks of becoming overly dependent on a major trading partner. The editorial specifically suggests that India should be cautious while negotiating economic deals with the United States.

Why is it in the news?

The United States and Canada are major trading partners, with highly integrated economies. However, differences over tariffs, trade policies and economic interests have periodically created tensions.

The present dispute highlights a broader issue: even close strategic partners can face economic pressure and trade conflicts when national interests diverge.

For India, this becomes important as India is simultaneously trying to deepen its economic relationship with the U.S.

What is the U.S.–Canada trade dispute?

The U.S. and Canada have historically enjoyed extensive trade relations.

Their economies are closely connected through:

  • Manufacturing
  • Energy
  • Agriculture
  • Automobiles
  • Minerals
  • Supply chains
  • Cross-border services

However, disagreements over tariffs, market access and trade policies can disrupt this relationship.

The key lesson is that economic interdependence does not eliminate the possibility of trade disputes.

Why is Canada vulnerable?

Canada’s economy is highly integrated with the U.S. economy because of:

Geographical proximity + Integrated supply chains + Large bilateral trade

A significant share of Canada’s international trade is connected to the U.S. market.

Therefore, any major change in U.S. tariff or trade policy can have a direct impact on Canadian industries.

This creates an important concept:

Trade dependence can become strategic vulnerability.

What lesson does this provide for India?

India is also trying to expand trade and investment ties with the United States.

The U.S. is an important market for Indian:

  • IT and business services
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Textiles
  • Engineering goods
  • Electronics
  • Chemicals
  • Gems and jewellery

At the same time, India needs to ensure that deeper economic integration does not result in excessive dependence on one market.

The editorial therefore cautions India to carefully evaluate the long-term implications of trade agreements with the U.S.

Trade diversification is important

One major lesson for India is the importance of diversification of export markets.

Instead of depending excessively on one country, India should expand trade with:

  • European Union
  • ASEAN
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Latin America

This can reduce the impact of sudden tariff changes or protectionist policies by any single country.

Simple example:

Overdependence on one market → Higher vulnerability

Diversified markets → Greater resilience

Supply-chain resilience

The U.S.–Canada dispute also highlights the importance of resilient supply chains.

Modern manufacturing often involves several countries.

For example:

Raw materials → Components → Manufacturing → Assembly → Export

If one country suddenly changes tariffs or trade regulations, the entire supply chain can be affected.

This is why India is promoting initiatives such as:

  • Make in India
  • Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes
  • Atmanirbhar Bharat
  • Diversification of supply chains

The objective is not complete isolation from global trade, but greater domestic capacity combined with diversified international partnerships.

Free trade vs protectionism

The issue also illustrates the tension between:

Free Trade

Countries reduce barriers to the movement of goods and services.

Advantages:

  • Greater competition
  • Lower prices
  • Larger markets
  • Efficient resource allocation

Protectionism

Governments protect domestic industries through measures such as:

  • Tariffs
  • Import restrictions
  • Subsidies
  • Quotas

Protectionism can protect domestic industries in the short term but may also lead to higher prices, retaliation and trade disputes.

Significance for India’s trade policy

India needs to maintain a balance between:

Global economic integration
and
Protection of domestic economic interests

India should therefore negotiate trade agreements based on:

  • Reciprocity
  • Market access
  • Protection of sensitive sectors
  • Rules of origin
  • Supply-chain security
  • Dispute-settlement mechanisms
  • Long-term strategic interests

Growth Spurt: Alternative Powertrains Become Mainstream in Automobiles

What is the news?

The editorial “Growth spurt: On data by Federation of Automobile Dealers’ Associations” discusses the latest automobile-sales data and highlights an important structural change in India’s automobile market: alternative powertrains are increasingly becoming mainstream.

What are alternative powertrains?

A powertrain is the system that generates power and transfers it to the vehicle’s wheels.

Traditionally, Indian automobiles have mainly used:

  • Petrol engines
  • Diesel engines

Alternative powertrains include:

  • Electric vehicles (EVs)
  • Hybrid vehicles
  • CNG vehicles
  • Other emerging low-emission technologies

The important trend highlighted by the editorial is that these alternatives are no longer confined to a small niche; they are becoming an increasingly important part of the automobile market.

What is driving this growth?

Several factors are encouraging consumers to shift towards alternative powertrains.

Rising fuel costs

Petrol and diesel vehicles can have significant running costs. Consumers are therefore increasingly considering vehicles that offer better fuel efficiency.

Environmental concerns

Transport is an important source of greenhouse-gas emissions and air pollution.

Greater adoption of EVs and other cleaner technologies can contribute to reducing emissions, particularly when electricity generation becomes cleaner.

Technological improvement

Battery technology, vehicle range, charging infrastructure and hybrid technology have improved considerably.

This has made alternative-powertrain vehicles more practical for consumers.

Government policies

Government incentives and policies promoting electric mobility and cleaner transportation have also supported the transition.

EVs vs Hybrid Vehicles

It is important for UPSC students to distinguish between these technologies.

Electric Vehicle (EV)

An EV is powered primarily by an electric motor and battery.

Advantages:

  • No tailpipe emissions
  • Lower operating and maintenance costs
  • Reduced dependence on petroleum

Challenges:

  • Charging infrastructure
  • Battery cost
  • Charging time
  • Battery-material supply chains
  • Dependence on electricity generation mix

Hybrid Vehicle

A hybrid combines an internal-combustion engine with an electric propulsion system.

It can therefore reduce fuel consumption while retaining the convenience of conventional refuelling.

Key difference:

EV → primarily electricity

Hybrid → electricity + conventional fuel

Why is this important for India's energy security?

India imports a substantial amount of its crude-oil requirements.

A large shift towards electric mobility can gradually reduce the country’s dependence on imported petroleum.

Therefore:

More EVs → Lower petroleum demand → Lower oil-import dependence → Greater energy security

However, this transition also creates new dependencies, particularly for critical minerals and battery components.

The Critical Mineral Challenge

EV batteries require minerals such as:

  • Lithium
  • Cobalt
  • Nickel
  • Graphite
  • Manganese

Many of these resources are concentrated geographically.

Therefore, India’s energy transition requires not only EV adoption but also:

  • Domestic mineral exploration
  • Recycling
  • Battery manufacturing
  • Diversified international supply chains
  • Research into alternative battery technologies

This creates a shift from oil security towards energy and critical-mineral security.

Impact on the Indian automobile industry

The growth of alternative powertrains is changing the automobile ecosystem.

It affects:

Automobile manufacturers → Component manufacturers → Battery industry → Charging infrastructure → Consumers → Employment

Traditional automobile components such as engines and exhaust systems may become less important over time, while demand for:

  • Batteries
  • Electric motors
  • Power electronics
  • Software
  • Charging equipment

is likely to increase.

Therefore, the transition is not merely about changing the type of vehicle—it represents a structural transformation of the automobile industry.

What should India focus on?

The growth of alternative powertrains is positive, but policy should remain technology-neutral and focused on long-term sustainability.

India needs to simultaneously promote:

  1. EV adoption
  2. Charging infrastructure
  3. Battery manufacturing
  4. Battery recycling
  5. Critical-mineral security
  6. Public transportation
  7. Cleaner electricity generation
  8. Research and development

A cleaner automobile fleet will have greater environmental benefits when the electricity used to charge EVs is itself increasingly generated from renewable and low-carbon sources.

The Global War on Terror, an Empowered Iran

Why in News?

The article argues that America’s post-9/11 wars created strategic openings that Iran was able to exploit, ultimately strengthening Iran’s position in West Asia. The article is especially significant as it marks 25 years since the 9/11 attacks and examines the long-term geopolitical consequences of the U.S.-led Global War on Terror.

What was the Global War on Terror?

The Global War on Terror (GWOT) was the U.S.-led campaign launched after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Its immediate objective was to dismantle Al-Qaeda and prevent terrorist organisations from using states as safe havens.

The major phases included:

  • 2001: U.S.-led intervention in Afghanistan against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
  • 2003: U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and overthrow of Saddam Hussein.
  • Later operations against ISIS and other terrorist organisations.

Over time, the campaign expanded from a specific response to 9/11 into a much broader counter-terrorism and military framework.

How did the War on Terror create opportunities for Iran?

This is the central argument of the article.

Iran did not directly cause the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, but the resulting changes in the regional balance of power created opportunities for Tehran.

Iraq is the most important example.

Before 2003:

Saddam Hussein’s Iraq → Major regional rival of Iran

After the U.S. invasion:

Saddam’s regime removed → Iraqi state weakened → New political order → Greater Iranian influence

Iran was able to build strong relationships with political parties, militias and other groups in Iraq.

Thus, an intervention intended to reshape the regional security order also removed one of Iran’s major regional rivals.

Afghanistan and the regional balance

The U.S. intervention in Afghanistan initially removed the Taliban government from power.

Iran had historically opposed the Taliban because of ideological differences and regional-security concerns.

However, the prolonged conflict also demonstrated the limits of military power in transforming political realities.

The eventual U.S. withdrawal in 2021 and Taliban return further highlighted the difficulty of achieving lasting political outcomes through military intervention alone.

Iran's growing regional network

Iran gradually developed relationships with various state and non-state actors across West Asia.

Important areas include:

Iraq → Syria → Lebanon

and extending towards:

Yemen

Iran’s support for groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, as well as its relationships with groups in Iraq and Yemen, has given Tehran what analysts often call strategic depth.

This network is commonly associated with Iran’s “Axis of Resistance.”

Why is this called an unintended consequence?

Unintended geopolitical consequences

A military intervention may achieve its immediate objective but simultaneously produce consequences that were not anticipated.

The broad chain can be understood as:

9/11

↓

U.S.-led War on Terror

↓

Afghanistan & Iraq interventions

↓

Weakening/restructuring of regional powers

↓

Power vacuums and instability

↓

Greater strategic space for Iran

Therefore, the article presents Iran’s empowerment as one of the long-term consequences of America’s post-9/11 strategy.

Impact on West Asian geopolitics

Iran’s increased influence has contributed to a more complicated regional balance involving:

  • Iran
  • United States
  • Israel
  • Gulf countries
  • Non-state armed groups
  • Regional powers

Iran’s missile capabilities, drone capabilities and relationships with regional armed groups have become important components of West Asian security calculations. Current U.S. Central Command assessments also continue to focus heavily on Iran and its regional network.

What does this teach us about great-power intervention?

The article provides an important lesson for International Relations:

Military superiority ≠ guaranteed political success

The U.S. possessed overwhelming military capabilities, but prolonged conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq produced complicated political and strategic consequences.

It demonstrates that successful foreign policy requires more than military strength:

  • Diplomacy
  • Local political legitimacy
  • Regional partnerships
  • Institution-building
  • Understanding of local politics
  • Long-term strategy

Significance for India

This issue is important for India because West Asian stability directly affects India’s strategic and economic interests.

Energy security

India has major energy interests in West Asia. Conflict can affect oil prices and supply routes.

Indian diaspora

A large Indian community lives and works in West Asian countries.

Maritime security

Instability in the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea can affect India’s trade and energy supplies.

India–Iran relations

Iran remains important for India’s connectivity interests, particularly through Chabahar Port, which provides access towards Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Strategic autonomy

India must maintain relations with:

Iran + Israel + Gulf countries + United States

while protecting its own strategic interests.

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)

Why in News?

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is currently in focus because of intensified action on food safety, hygiene and labelling standards. A major recent issue is FSSAI’s proposal for front-of-pack warning labels on packaged foods high in nutrients such as added sugar, salt and saturated fat. The Supreme Court has also questioned the proposed implementation approach, prompting FSSAI to indicate that it is open to stricter measures.

What is FSSAI?

FSSAI stands for Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.

It is a statutory authority established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

Its primary responsibility is to ensure that food available to consumers is:

  • Safe
  • Hygienic
  • Properly labelled
  • Of prescribed quality
  • Free from harmful adulteration

FSSAI works under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Why was FSSAI established?

Before the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, food regulation in India was spread across several different laws and regulatory orders.

The 2006 Act sought to create a single, science-based framework for food safety and standards.

Thus:

Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 → Establishment of FSSAI → Unified food-safety regulatory framework

Major functions of FSSAI

FSSAI performs several important functions:

Setting food standards

It establishes standards for different food products and ingredients.

Regulation of food businesses

Food businesses are required to obtain appropriate FSSAI registration or licence, depending on the applicable requirements.

Food testing

FSSAI works with laboratories and authorities to monitor food quality and safety.

Preventing adulteration

It takes action against unsafe, adulterated or misbranded food products.

Food labelling

It regulates information that must appear on food packages, including nutritional and other mandatory declarations.

Consumer awareness

FSSAI also promotes awareness about safe and healthy food practices.

Current issue: Front-of-Pack Warning Labels

One of the important recent developments is FSSAI’s proposal for front-of-pack warning labels on certain packaged foods.

The proposed system focuses on nutrients such as:

  • Added sugar
  • Salt
  • Saturated fat

The objective is to allow consumers to understand the nutritional risks of a product quickly and easily before purchasing it.

Why is this important?

Nutrition information is often provided on the back or side of a package and can be difficult for consumers to interpret.

A prominent warning on the front of the package could help consumers make more informed choices.

Role of the Supreme Court

The issue has also entered the judicial domain.

The Supreme Court has questioned the proposed phased approach to implementing stricter warning labels and sought greater clarity on how the system would protect public health. FSSAI has indicated that it is open to tightening the proposed framework.

This raises an important policy question:

Should food regulation focus only on providing information, or should it actively discourage consumption of foods associated with health risks?

FSSAI and food adulteration

Another major responsibility of FSSAI and State food-safety authorities is tackling food adulteration and unsafe food practices.

Recent enforcement drives have found problems such as:

  • Poor hygiene
  • Expired food products
  • Improper storage
  • Pest infestation
  • Misleading labelling
  • Unlicensed food operations

For example, recent inspections in Telangana resulted in action against establishments for serious hygiene violations, including spoiled food and pest infestation.

This shows that food safety is not limited to packaged foods; it also includes restaurants, hotels, bakeries, hostels and other food businesses.

FSSAI and food labelling

Food labels are important because consumers should be able to know:

  • Ingredients
  • Nutritional information
  • Manufacturing/packing details
  • Best-before/expiry information
  • Manufacturer details
  • FSSAI licence/registration details
  • Vegetarian/non-vegetarian declaration, where applicable

Recent food-safety inspections have specifically focused on compliance with mandatory labelling requirements and misleading health or nutritional claims.

Importance for public health

Food safety is closely connected with public health.

Unsafe food can cause:

  • Food poisoning
  • Infections
  • Nutritional disorders
  • Long-term health problems

At the same time, excessive consumption of foods high in salt, sugar and unhealthy fats is associated with increasing concerns about non-communicable diseases.

Therefore, food regulation increasingly involves both:

Food safety + Healthy dietary choices

Challenges before FSSAI

Despite having a national regulatory framework, India faces several challenges:

  1. Large informal food sector

A significant number of food businesses operate on a small or informal scale.

  1. Enforcement capacity

Effective regulation requires sufficient food-safety officers and laboratories.

  1. Food adulteration

Adulteration remains a concern across several food categories.

  1. Consumer awareness

Many consumers do not fully understand nutritional labels.

  1. Industry concerns

Stricter labelling requirements may increase compliance costs for food manufacturers.

  1. Centre–State coordination

Food safety enforcement involves both central and State-level authorities.

Important facts for Prelims

Topic

Fact

FSSAI

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

Parent law

Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006

Ministry

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare

Nature

Statutory authority

Main objective

Food safety and food standards

Key areas

Standards, licensing, testing, labelling, enforcement

Current issue

Front-of-pack warning labels

Discover more from Primus Civil Services Academy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top

Discover more from Primus Civil Services Academy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading